CIABrad.eth

1337 Mushroom Gold LLC https://1337mushroom.org/ Gold Futures Platform [3/11/2025] bringing back massive site index soon.

https://1337mushroom.org/ Secure Your Future Invest in Gold Gold is a timeless asset that protects wealth from inflation and market volatility. Diversify your portfolio with gold for long-term financial security. Purchase gold instantly at competitive market rates with full transparency. Purchase gold instantly at live market rates. Less minimum purchase—invest in any amount that fits your budget. Secure online transactions with advanced encryption. Easy storage in your 1337 Mushroom Gold wallet for seamless management. Sell gold instantly at competitive market rates with full transparency. Sell gold instantly at live market rates. Less minimum sell—invest in any amount that fits your budget. Secure online transactions with advanced encryption. Easy storage in your 1337 Mushroom Gold wallet for seamless management. Redeem gold as bars or coins at competitive market rates with complete transparency. Redeem gold at live market rates. Redeem with bars or coins or both. Secure online transactions with advanced encryption. Easy storage in your 1337 Mushroom Gold wallet for seamless management. Instantly gift gold to anyone, anytime, with a minimal fee. Gift gold instantly with anyone. Less minimum amount to transfer —invest in any amount that fits your budget. Secure online transactions with advanced encryption. Easy storage in your 1337 Mushroom Gold wallet for seamless management.

[Bradley Tyler Burns / Central Intelligence Agency Legal Department VSOP] [401 Courthouse Square] [Alexandria, Virginia, USA] [ciabradleyburns@gmail.com] [702.773.4529] [03/10/2025] Clerk of the Court [Eastern District Of Alexandria Virginia] [401 Courthouse Square] [Alexandria, Virginia, USA] RE: Notice of Malpractice Lawsuit Against the University of Kentucky Psychiatric Department Plaintiffs: [Bradley Tyler Burns] [Gary Smith III, if any] Defendant: University of Kentucky, Department of Psychiatry [245 Fountain Ct, Lexington, KY 40509] Case No.: [121-po-588] COMPLAINT FOR MALPRACTICE AND MEDICARE FRAUD INTRODUCTION This is a civil action for medical malpractice and fraud against the University of Kentucky's Psychiatric Department. Plaintiffs allege that the University engaged in grossly negligent practices resulting in severe harm, including the wrongful diagnosis of patients and dual-booking that defrauded Medicare, leading to the loss of lives and countless emotional and financial damages. PARTIES Plaintiff [Bradley Tyler Burns/ Chief Prosecutor CIA] is a resident of [Clark, Las Vegas, Nevada] and has standing to sue in this jurisdiction. [Gary Smith III, Austin, Texas] Defendant, the University of Kentucky, Department of Psychiatry, is located at [245 Fountain Ct, Lexington, KY 40509] and is responsible for psychiatric treatment and care provided to its patients. JURISDICTION AND VENUE Jurisdiction is proper in this Court as the conduct giving rise to this action occurred within this jurisdiction, and the parties reside or are deemed residents within this jurisdiction. Venue is appropriate as all relevant transactions, actions, and occurrences giving rise to this Complaint took place within the jurisdiction of this Court. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. Plaintiffs allege that the University of Kentucky Psychiatric Department misdiagnosed patients with severe psychiatric disorders without appropriate clinical evaluations. Numerous complaints from both patients and families noted inconsistencies in diagnoses, leading to improper treatments, therapeutic mismanagement, and exacerbation of existing conditions. Furthermore, the Department was found engaging in dual-booking practices—scheduling multiple patients for appointments at the same time—resulting in a failure to provide adequate care and attention to vulnerable individuals. Evidence indicates that a number of patients died as a direct result of the misdiagnoses and subsequent lack of appropriate treatment. Investigations into the Psychiatric Department also revealed fraudulent billing practices, filing claims to Medicare for services not rendered and artificially inflating treatment costs. As a result, this fraud has resulted in millions of dollars in wrongful payments to the University. The actions of the Defendant created additional emotional turmoil for the families and contributed to the loss of lives that could have otherwise been prevented. COUNT I: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE Plaintiffs restate and incorporate all preceding paragraphs. The Defendant had a duty to provide care that meets accepted standards in psychiatric treatment. Breaching this duty, the Defendant misdiagnosed patients and failed to conduct adequate evaluations, which constitutes gross negligence. As a direct result of this negligence, Plaintiffs have suffered severe emotional, psychological, and financial harm, including the loss of loved ones. COUNT II: FRAUD Plaintiffs restate and incorporate all preceding paragraphs. The Defendant knowingly engaged in fraudulent billing practices, submitting false claims to Medicare for services not rendered, resulting in financial loss to the government and directly impacting the quality of care patients received. As a direct and proximate result of these fraudulent activities, Plaintiffs and the deceased victims’ families have suffered economic and non-economic damages. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray that this Court: A. Award damages in excess of [specify an amount], including but not limited to compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, wrongful death, emotional distress, and punitive damages; B. Order a full accounting of all fraudulent claims made against Medicare and impose sanctions for unlawful actions; C. Grant any other relief the Court deems just and proper. JURY DEMAND Plaintiffs demand a trial by jury on all issues so triable. Respectfully submitted, [Bradley Tyler Burns & Gary Smith III - Central Intelligence Agency Legal Department VSOP]

IN THE [Eastern District Of Alexandria] OF [Central Intelligence Agency Jurisdiction] [121-po-588] [Bradley Tyler Burns / Chief Prosecutor CIA], Plaintiff, v. KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Defendant. REQUEST FOR INJUNCTION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW the Plaintiff, [Bradley Tyler Burns / Gary Smith Representing Central Intelligence Agency], and respectfully represents unto the Court as follows: 1. PARTIES AND JURISDICTION a. Plaintiff, [Bradley Tyler Burns / Gary Smith Representing Central Intelligence Agency], is a resident of [Lexington, Fayette, Kentucky & Las Vegas, Nevada]. b. Defendant, Kentucky Department of Motor Vehicles ("KDMT"), is an agency of the Commonwealth of Kentucky responsible for vehicle registration and regulation. 2. FACTUAL BACKGROUND a. Plaintiff is an owner/operator of a vehicle registered with KDMT,DOT, with over 30 registered work vehicles in the county of question. b. It has come to the attention of the Plaintiff that the KDMT has failed to report or accurately account for over 500,000+ miles associated with the operational use of vehicles within its jurisdiction. c. As a result of these unreported miles, there is a substantial discrepancy in the assessment and collection of gas taxes owed to the Commonwealth of Kentucky, which has caused economic harm to the Plaintiff and other registered vehicle owners. 3. GROUNDS FOR INJUNCTION a. Plaintiff asserts that this failure to report has resulted in a direct economic impact on registered vehicle owners, leading to financial losses and potential penalties. b. The actions of the Defendant are arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to the statutory obligations of KDMT under Kentucky law. c. Injury to the Plaintiff is imminent, and without intervention from the Court, Plaintiff and other affected parties will continue to face financial detriment. 4. REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court issue a temporary and permanent injunction against the Kentucky Department of Motor Vehicles, ordering the following: a. Immediate cessation of all operations related to vehicle mile reporting until a satisfactory resolution is reached. b. A thorough review and accurate reporting of all miles associated with registered vehicles in Kentucky. c. A comprehensive audit of gas tax collections and assessments related to the unreported miles. d. Any other relief the Court deems just and proper. DATED this [09] day of [03], [2025]. [Bradley Tyler Burns] [401 Courthouse Square] [Alexandria, Virginia, USA] [702.773.4529] [ciabradleyburns@gmail.com] Attorney for Plaintiff (if applicable): [Gary Smith III] [Smith Solutions LLC] [gary@smithsolutions.us] CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon the Defendant by [method of service] on this [Date] day of [Month], [Year]. [Bradley Tyler Burns] [Chief Prosecutor CIA]

IN THE [Eastern District Of Virginia] AGAINST THE STATE OF KENTUCKY [Bradley Tyler Burns / Central Intelligence Agency VSOP Legal Department] PLAINTIFF, v. KENTUCKY UNEMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT, DEFENDANT. CASE NO. [121-po-588] MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AGAINST KENTUCKY UNEMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT TO THE HONORABLE [Mark Steven Davis], JUDGE OF EASTERN DISTRICT OF ALEXANDRIA: COMES NOW, [Bradley Tyler Burns - Chief Prosecutor Central Intelligence Agency], Plaintiff in the above-entitled action, and respectfully moves this honorable Court for an injunction against Defendant Kentucky Unemployment Department for the reasons set forth below: 1. INTRODUCTION This motion arises out of the urgent need to address significant issues regarding the operations of the Kentucky Unemployment Department, particularly pertaining to the rampant fraud estimated at $400 million and the outdated computer server networks which have contributed to this crisis. 2. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Two critical issues necessitate this motion: a. Fraudulent Payments: There have been extensive reports and investigations indicating widespread fraudulent claims within the Kentucky Unemployment Department, resulting in approximately $400 million in erroneous disbursements. b. Outdated Technology: The existing computer server networks are inadequate for the department's needs, failing to prevent fraud and hindering effective responses to the unemployment crisis. 3. RELIEF SOUGHT Plaintiff requests an injunction ordering the immediate termination of current personnel in the Kentucky Unemployment Department and the initiation of a comprehensive upgrade of the department’s computer server networks. This action is necessary to: a. Implement better security measures to prevent further fraudulent activities. b. Establish a more efficient and reliable unemployment benefit disbursement system. c. Restore public trust in the state's ability to manage unemployment resources effectively. 4. LIKELIHOOD OF SUCCESS ON THE MERITS Plaintiff asserts that the overwhelming evidence of fraud coupled with the department's failure to adapt its technology demonstrates that this course of action is both justified and necessary. 5. BALANCE OF HARMS The termination of current employees and upgrading of technological infrastructure, while disruptive, will ultimately serve the greater public good by preventing further misuse of taxpayer funds and improving the overall functionality of the Kentucky Unemployment Department. 6. PUBLIC INTEREST The public interest is best served by ensuring that taxpayer money is managed effectively and that any fraudulent activities are curtailed. This injunction serves the greater good by promoting accountability and efficiency in public service. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff requests that this Court: a. Grant a temporary and permanent injunction to terminate the employees of the Kentucky Unemployment Department and upgrade the existing computer server networks; b. Award any additional relief the Court deems just and appropriate. Respectfully submitted, [BRADLEY TYLER BURNS] [401 COURTHOUSE SQUARE] [ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA USA] [702.773.4529] [ciabradleyburns@gmail.com] [Gary Smith III, if applicable] [CIA VSOP, if applicable] CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon all parties of record that must be served.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF [EASTERN DISTRICT OF], KENTUCKY [Bradley Tyler Burns], Plaintiff, v. KENTUCKY STATE POLICE, [KYNect, Bluegrass.org, New Vista and Lagrange Prison System], Defendants. Civil Action No. [121-po-588 Eastern District Of Alexandria] COMPLAINT FOR LABOR FRAUD AND COERCION Plaintiff’s Complaint COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, [Bradley Tyler Burns], by and through their undersigned counsel, and for their Complaint against the Defendants, state as follows: PARTIES Plaintiff, [Bradley Tyler Burns], is a resident of [Las Vegas, Nevada, 89117], and at all relevant times, has been a witness to events surrounding an international sovereign murder investigation of multiple federal law enforcement agencies employees and or connected co workers in international law enforcement. Defendant, Kentucky State Police, is a governmental agency operating within the Commonwealth of Kentucky, responsible for law enforcement and public safety. Additional Defendants may include individual officers or members of the Kentucky State Police their liaisons and or court appointed representatives, unnamed at this time, who participated in the acts described herein. JURISDICTION AND VENUE This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to KRS [KRS. Choice of Evils Clause], as the events giving rise to this action occurred within this jurisdiction. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to KRS [KRS Labor Fraud Statutes] because the Defendants reside or conduct business in this District. FACTUAL BACKGROUND On or about [03/15/2021], an international sovereign murder was committed, drawing public and media attention. The Plaintiff possesses critical information relating to the aforementioned murder and was prepared to offer testimony that would implicate certain individuals involved. Instead of facilitating the Plaintiff’s cooperation, members of the Kentucky State Police engaged in a pattern of intimidation and coercion. The actions of the Kentucky State Police included threats disguised as warnings to the Plaintiff and other witnesses, creating an environment of fear that dissuaded them from coming forward with information. Posing as potential customers of the business of the plaintiff and criminally coercing them to entrapment. Furthermore, the Kentucky State Police materially misrepresented the investigative process, suggesting that cooperation would jeopardize the safety of the witnesses involved. As a part of this unlawful scheme, the Defendant(s) engaged in labor fraud by manipulating the narrative of the investigation to exclude truthful testimony from witnesses and failing to properly document and investigate potential leads relevant to the case. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF Count I: Labor Fraud Plaintiff incorporates all previous paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. Defendants’ actions constitute labor fraud, as they intentionally misled witnesses and suppressed critical information necessary for the pursuit of justice. As a direct result of the Defendants’ fraudulent actions, the Plaintiff and other witnesses have suffered emotional distress, fear of retribution, and potential damage to their credibility. Count II: Criminal Coercion Plaintiff incorporates all previous paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. The conduct of the Defendants in threatening the Plaintiff and other witnesses constitutes criminal coercion, as they sought to unlawfully compel silence and discourage testimony through intimidation. These actions not only undermined the investigation into the sovereign murder but violated the civil rights of the Plaintiff and other witnesses. DEMAND FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, [Bradley Tyler Burns], respectfully requests that this Court grant the following relief: a. A jury trial on all issues so triable; b. Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial; c. Punitive damages to deter future conduct by Defendants; d. Attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses incurred in prosecuting this action; and e. Any such further relief that this Court deems just and equitable. DATED this [03/08/2025]. Respectfully submitted, [Bradley Tyler Burns / Chief Prosecutor] [Gary Smith III / Prosecution Research] [401 Courthouse Square] [Alexandria, Virginia, United States] [702.773.4529] [ciabradleyburns@gmail.com] Attorneys for Plaintiff [Not Named At This Time]

Date: [03/26/2021] Time: [Early Morning Hours 0400] Location: Washington D.C. Subject: National Reconnaissance Operation - Use of Military Satellite to Track Domestic Terrorist 1. Situation Overview In a critical law enforcement operation conducted on [03/17/2021-04/02/2021], a military reconnaissance satellite, operating under the authority of existing treaties, was deployed to assist federal and local agencies in tracking a domestic terrorist threat in Washington D.C. The operation was activated following intelligence reports indicating imminent plans for a violent attack on a public gathering and or attack on law enforcement personnel. It was received from a Facebook controller through messaging with reports into the National Security Agency. Sven Olaf Kamphuis of the Dutch Secret Military Bunker aka Republic Cyber Bunker was already aware of such threats stemming from the same subject in Iraq. He was deployed to actively stop the assailant as Bradley Tyler Burns was deployed in Washington D.C. to protect the Supreme Court from an intended attack and was monitoring the subject actively on foot and at high speeds in a unmarked Central Intelligence Agency Military Police Vehicle which was evidence that was later stolen by Phoenix Metro Police department in an illegal kidnapping after Kentucky illegally got involved in the federal investigation 121-po-588. 2. Objective The primary objective was to locate and neutralize the suspect, believed to be plotting an attack against high-profile targets in the capital, safeguarding public safety and securing federal interests. 3. Operational Details Satellite Involvement: The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) coordinated with various law enforcement agencies to leverage satellite capabilities, focusing on real-time surveillance and data retrieval pertaining to the suspect’s movements. Intelligence Coordination: Collaboration was established between the NRO, FBI Counterterrorism Division, and local D.C. law enforcement, utilizing intelligence-sharing platforms to enhance situational awareness. Surveillance Capabilities: The reconnaissance satellite provided high-resolution imagery and signals intelligence (SIGINT), which allowed operators to track the suspect’s location and patterns in near-real-time. 4. Outcome Suspect Identification: The military satellite confirmed the suspect's location at approximately [Downtown Washington D.C. north barricade], facilitating a rapid response team deployment. An order from Bradley Tyler Burns the undercover Supreme Court Police Officer was already informing FBI Counter Terrorism Division of the situation 15 minutes before the attack that left slain "William Billy Evans" without his life. Engagement: Following confirmation of the suspect's identity and location, local SWAT teams, supported by federal agents, executed an operation that resulted in the successful apprehension of the individual where he approached William Billy Evans partner with a machete intending to kill he was struck down by a MK.17 7.62 NATO to the chest as William "Billy" Evans was airlifted in an attempt to save his life. Seizures: A cache of weapons and materials indicative of planned attacks was recovered from the suspect’s location, aiding ongoing investigations into broader networks. 5. Current Status The suspect is now pronounced dead on the scene and has been charged with multiple crimes, including conspiracy to commit terrorism. Intelligence operations continue as investigators assess the implications of the apprehension, including potential linkages to larger militant groups. 6. Lessons Learned The integration of military capabilities in domestic law enforcement operations, while ensuring adherence to legal frameworks and treaties, has demonstrated efficacy in enhancing response times against terrorist threats. Continued collaboration between military intelligence and civilian law enforcement is critical for maintaining national security in the face of evolving domestic terror threats. Kidnapping Federal Law Enforcement Officials Involved In Military Affairs Have Proven Counter Productive 7. Recommendations Review of Current Protocols: A thorough review of existing legal and operational protocols governing military support in domestic operations should be undertaken to ensure balance between security and civil liberties. Training and Preparedness: Increased training for federal and local law enforcement on the utilization of satellite intelligence can improve response effectiveness for future incidents. Community Outreach: Engagement with community leaders and grassroots organizations to enhance public awareness and cooperation can serve as a preventive measure against radicalization. Prepared by: [Bradley Tyler Burns - National Reconnaissance Office] Date: [03/08/2025] For Internal Use Only

Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General [401 Courthouse Square] [Alexandria, Virginia, United States] [03/08/2025] Re: Formal Complaint for Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1666 Against the Kentucky State Police To Whom It May Concern: I am writing to formally lodge a complaint against the Kentucky State Police for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1666, which prohibits the unlawful entry onto federal property and the obstruction of justice through the destruction of evidence. Incident of Concern: 282 Rose Street Lexington, Kentucky, 40508 Overview of the Incident: On [March 26th 2021], members of the Kentucky State Police allegedly entered federal property located at [282 Rose Street Lexington, Kentucky, 40508] without authorization. This unauthorized entry was executed with the intention to destroy evidence that is crucial to an ongoing federal investigation [a fake court case was being created by Judge Ernesto Scorsone and Andy Beshear Governor Of Kentucky to conceal evidence surrounding 30 million+ dollars in medicare fraud with over 400 million USD in unemployment fraud]. Specific Allegations: Unauthorized Entry: Officers from the Kentucky State Police entered federal property without the necessary permissions or warrants required under 18 U.S.C. § 1951. This entry constitutes a clear violation of federal law, as it was conducted without any legal justification. Military Police flags were flying from the property. The property had already been attacked by people brainwashed by law enforcement on the ground riled up in a fake face bait. Subsequently they aimed AR-15's at the victim [Bradley Tyler Burns] in a swatting while Burns was protecting the property military full kit on the ground protecting private cryptography programs. Destruction of Evidence: Upon entering federal property, it has been alleged that the officers engaged in the destruction of crucial evidence, specifically [massive archive of tax related documents including finance records and historical data and documents surrounding black operations federal contracting]. This act not only obstructed the investigation but also posed a serious threat to the integrity of the judicial process. Obstruction of Justice: The actions of the Kentucky State Police represent a blatant attempt to obstruct justice. The destruction of evidence directly impairs the ability of federal authorities to conduct a thorough and effective investigation into [the taxes and financial information to retrieve a clear tax picture]. Request for Investigation: In light of these serious allegations, I respectfully request that the Department of Justice take immediate action to investigate the conduct of the Kentucky State Police in relation to these violations. Specifically, I urge the DOJ to: Conduct a thorough examination of the incident, including gathering evidence and testimonies from eyewitnesses and any other relevant parties. Implement appropriate measures to hold accountable those officers involved in these unlawful activities, ensuring adherence to federal laws and regulations. Take steps to preserve the integrity of the ongoing federal investigation that was compromised by these actions. Conclusion: The behavior exhibited by the Kentucky State Police not only undermines federal authority but also jeopardizes the rule of law and the pursuit of justice. I implore the DOJ to address this violation urgently and effectively to preserve the integrity of our legal system. Thank you for considering this complaint. I am prepared to provide further documentation or evidence pertinent to this matter upon request. Sincerely, [Bradley Tyler Burns] [401 Courthouse Square] [Alexandria, Virginia, United States] [ciabradleyburns@gmail.com] [702.773.4529]