CIABrad.eth Posted March 20 Member ID: 1 Group: Administrators Followers: 2 Topic Count: 63 Topics Per Day: 2.03 Content Count: 6,924 Content Per Day: 223.35 Reputation: 5 Achievement Points: 69,149 Solved Content: 0 Days Won: 2 Joined: 03/03/2025 Status: Offline Last Seen: 23 hours ago Timezone: America/Chicago Device: Linux Posted March 20 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Supreme Court Injunction against the Lexington Fayette Urban County Government for institutional gerrymandering [Bradley Tyler Burns / Chief Prosecutor CIA] [401 Courthouse Square] [Alexandria, Virginia] [ciabradleyburns@gmail.com] [702.773.4529] Petitioner, v. Lexington Fayette Urban County Government, Respondent. Case No. [121-po-588] INJUNCTION ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Supreme Court of the United States on the petition from [Bradley Tyler Burns / Chief Prosecutor CIA], seeking an injunction against the Lexington Fayette Urban County Government for alleged institutional gerrymandering in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. FINDINGS OF FACT: The petitioner alleges that the districting plan enacted by the Lexington Fayette Urban County Government has been drawn in a manner that dilutes the voting power of specific demographic groups, thereby infringing upon their constitutional rights. The petitioner provided credible evidence indicating a pattern of intentional manipulation of district boundaries to achieve electoral advantages, contrary to principles of equitable representation. The relevant districts were established without sufficient consideration for population equality and community interests, leading to excessive partisan bias in electoral outcomes. The petitioner asserts that these practices undermine the fundamental democratic principle of fair representation in violation of constitutional protections. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: The systematic alteration of electoral districts to favor one group over another constitutes a clear case of gerrymandering, which is incompatible with the principles of representative democracy as outlined in the United States Constitution. The evidence presented substantiates the claim that the current districting plan violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as it fails to guarantee equal legislative representation. The petitioner has shown a likelihood of success on the merits and that failure to grant this injunction would result in irreparable harm to affected constituents and undermine the integrity of the electoral process. ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Lexington Fayette Urban County Government shall cease all enforcement and implementation of the current districting plan until a thorough judicial review can be conducted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Lexington Fayette Urban County Government shall submit a revised districting plan to the Court within [insert appropriate timeframe, e.g., 90 days] that complies with the requirements of equal protection and fair representation as embodied in the Constitution of the United States. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the conditions outlined in this injunction shall remain in effect until such time as the Court can determine the constitutionality of the revised districting plan and hear any further arguments from both parties. The Court retains jurisdiction over this matter for enforcement of this order and for any necessary modifications or further orders as the evidence demands. SO ORDERED this [1st] day of [April], 20[25]. Petitioner [Bradley Tyler Burns / Chief Prosecutor CIA] [List of Attorneys, if applicable] None. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.