FORMAL COMPLAINT FOR LABOR FRAUD AND COERCION AGAINST KENTUCKY STATE POLICE

[CIABrad.eth]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF [EASTERN DISTRICT OF], KENTUCKY

[Bradley Tyler Burns],
Plaintiff,
v.
KENTUCKY STATE POLICE,
[KYNect, Bluegrass.org, New Vista and Lagrange Prison System],
Defendants.

Civil Action No. [121-po-588 Eastern District Of Alexandria]

COMPLAINT FOR LABOR FRAUD AND COERCION

Plaintiff’s Complaint

COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, [Bradley Tyler Burns], by and through their undersigned counsel, and for their Complaint against the Defendants, state as follows:

PARTIES

1. Plaintiff, [Bradley Tyler Burns], is a resident of [Las Vegas, Nevada, 89117], and at all relevant times, has been a witness to events surrounding an international sovereign murder investigation of multiple federal law enforcement agencies employees and or connected co workers in international law enforcement.

2. Defendant, Kentucky State Police, is a governmental agency operating within the Commonwealth of Kentucky, responsible for law enforcement and public safety.

3. Additional Defendants may include individual officers or members of the Kentucky State Police their liaisons and or court appointed representatives, unnamed at this time, who participated in the acts described herein.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

4. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to KRS [KRS. Choice of Evils Clause], as the events giving rise to this action occurred within this jurisdiction.

5. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to KRS [KRS Labor Fraud Statutes] because the Defendants reside or conduct business in this District.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

6. On or about [03/15/2021], an international sovereign murder was committed, drawing public and media attention.

7. The Plaintiff possesses critical information relating to the aforementioned murder and was prepared to offer testimony that would implicate certain individuals involved.

8. Instead of facilitating the Plaintiff’s cooperation, members of the Kentucky State Police engaged in a pattern of intimidation and coercion.

9. The actions of the Kentucky State Police included threats disguised as warnings to the Plaintiff and other witnesses, creating an environment of fear that dissuaded them from coming forward with information. Posing as potential customers of the business of the plaintiff and criminally coercing them to entrapment.

10. Furthermore, the Kentucky State Police materially misrepresented the investigative process, suggesting that cooperation would jeopardize the safety of the witnesses involved.

11. As a part of this unlawful scheme, the Defendant(s) engaged in labor fraud by manipulating the narrative of the investigation to exclude truthful testimony from witnesses and failing to properly document and investigate potential leads relevant to the case.

CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

Count I: Labor Fraud

12. Plaintiff incorporates all previous paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.

13. Defendants’ actions constitute labor fraud, as they intentionally misled witnesses and suppressed critical information necessary for the pursuit of justice.

14. As a direct result of the Defendants’ fraudulent actions, the Plaintiff and other witnesses have suffered emotional distress, fear of retribution, and potential damage to their credibility.

Count II: Criminal Coercion

15. Plaintiff incorporates all previous paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.

16. The conduct of the Defendants in threatening the Plaintiff and other witnesses constitutes criminal coercion, as they sought to unlawfully compel silence and discourage testimony through intimidation.

17. These actions not only undermined the investigation into the sovereign murder but violated the civil rights of the Plaintiff and other witnesses.

DEMAND FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, [Bradley Tyler Burns], respectfully requests that this Court grant the following relief:

a. A jury trial on all issues so triable;
b. Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial;
c. Punitive damages to deter future conduct by Defendants;
d. Attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses incurred in prosecuting this action; and
e. Any such further relief that this Court deems just and equitable.

DATED this [03/08/2025].

Respectfully submitted,

[Bradley Tyler Burns / Chief Prosecutor]
[Gary Smith III / Prosecution Research]
[401 Courthouse Square]
[Alexandria, Virginia, United States]
[702.773.4529]
[ciabradleyburns@gmail.com]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

[Not Named At This Time]