United States Airforce Tencap - Writ of Certiorari

[CIABrad.eth]

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Petitioner: [Bradley Tyler Burns - Rank 06 Colonel, United States Air Force]
Respondent: [Relevant Authority / Central Intelligence Agency - C1305208 - 121-po-588]

Writ of Certiorari

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States:

Petitioner, [Bradley Tyler Burns Rank 06 Colonel], a seasoned officer in the United States Air Force, respectfully petitions this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of [Eastern District Of Kentucky], which upheld the legality of the arrest of Petitioner without proper jurisdiction or justification. The implications of this arrest extend beyond the individual case; they carry significant ramifications for national security, the integrity of military operations, and the management of critical defense contracts, particularly those involving classified projects at Lockheed Martin, Boeing, RedHat Area 51 Miltary Unit Reverse Engineering Unit, NAICS Codes For Federal Military Contractors.

Questions Presented

1. Did the lower court err in affirming the legality of the arrest of a high-ranking military officer without due process, thereby undermining established military jurisdiction?

2. What are the broader implications of such an arrest on the management of sensitive defense contracts and operational security in relation to private sector entities involved in national defense?

Facts of the Case

Petitioner, a Colonel (06) in the United States Air Force, was unlawfully detained by [Kentucky State Police Governor Special Detail] while executing official duties that involved close collaboration with counterparts at Lockheed Martin and Colonel (06) [Col. Bradley Tyler Burns & Col. Michael Kornblum], an officer in the United States Marine Corps Co Operating with an Officer in the United States Air Force, on matters crucial to national security and defense readiness. This collaboration included oversight and management of classified black operations data center contracts that are vital for the effective delivery of military capabilities.

The unlawful arrest, executed without adherence to legal standards required for military personnel, raises concerns about the jurisdiction of civil authorities over military matters and the potential disruption of ongoing military operations. The decision of the lower court failed to recognize these critical issues, leading to a decision that not only affects Petitioner but also jeopardizes the integrity and functionality of interservice cooperation and private sector partnerships that are essential for national defense.

Arguments

1. Violation of Military Jurisdiction and Due Process: The lower court’s ruling sets a dangerous precedent by permitting civil authorities to arrest active-duty military personnel without appropriate military oversight. Such actions compromise the established principles of military law and threaten the constitutional protections afforded to service members under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

2. Impact on National Security: The arrest of Petitioner adversely impacts the management of classified operations and data centers that Lockheed Martin operates under contract with the Department of Defense. Disruption in leadership and oversight due to arbitrary legal action against military personnel can lead to breaches in operational security and management inefficiencies, directly hindering the United States' defense capabilities.

3. Precedent for Future Cases: Allowing this arrest to stand would create an alarming precedent where civilian agencies could intervene in military matters, undermining the command structure of armed forces and causing confusion regarding jurisdictional authority. Such judicial overreach could deter military officers from engaging in essential collaborative efforts with civilian contractors due to fear of unjust reprisal.

Conclusion

For the reasons stated, Petitioner respectfully requests that this Court grant the writ of certiorari to ensure a comprehensive review of the important issues surrounding military jurisdiction, due process, and the vital operations of national defense. The implications of the decision below are profound, affecting not only the rights of military personnel but also the national security interests of the United States.

Dated this [03] of [01], [2025].
Respectfully submitted,
[Bradley Tyler Burns - Chief Prosecution Central Intelligence Agency]
[401 Court House Square Eastern District Of Alexandria]
[Secret Tunnel System In The Denver International Airport]
[Gary Smith III, if applicable]