United States Supreme Court - Writ Of Certiorari

[CIABrad.eth]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF [United States]

PETITIONER: [Bradley Tyler Burns]
RESPONDENT: [Supreme Court Special Police/CIA 31382
CASE NO.: [121-po-588]

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

To the Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of [United States]:

Petitioner, [Bradley Tyler Burns], hereby petitions this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the [Eastern District Of Alexandria Virginia] dated [March 28th 2021] concerning the unlawful detention of Petitioner by the state law enforcement while acting in the capacity of a Supreme Court Special Police Officer.

I. INTRODUCTION

This writ seeks to address serious constitutional issues regarding unlawful detention, the abuse of power by state law enforcement, and the potential cover-up of criminal wrongdoing, including the murder of a Special Detective involved in the case.

II. STATEMENT OF FACTS

1. On [March 26th 2021], Petitioner was lawfully operating as a Supreme Court Special Police Officer, fully authorized to carry out official duties enforcing the law and ensuring public safety.

2. On the same date, Petitioner was stopped and detained by state law enforcement officers, who lacked probable cause or legal justification for said detention.

3. During the unlawful detention, officers questioned Petitioner regarding ongoing investigations and made threats regarding potential repercussions if Petitioner continued to pursue his lawful duties.

4. Subsequently, on [April 2nd 2021], a Special Detective associated with the investigation into state law enforcement's actions was found deceased under suspicious circumstances, raising serious concerns of foul play.

5. There exists substantial evidence that state law enforcement officers may have orchestrated or been complicit in actions leading up to the Special Detective's death to obstruct justice and thwart further investigations into their illegal conduct.

III. QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. Did the state law enforcement officers violate Petitioner’s constitutional rights by unlawfully detaining him without probable cause while acting within the scope of his official duties as a Special Police Officer?

2. Is there sufficient evidence to implicate state law enforcement officers in the murder of a Special Detective, which could reveal systemic corruption and obstruction of justice?

IV. ARGUMENT

A. Unlawful Detention

The Fourth Amendment guarantees protection from unreasonable searches and seizures. Petitioner was detained without probable cause, violating his constitutional rights. This Court should evaluate the lower court's failure to recognize the unlawful nature of such detention and outline appropriate remedies.

B. Potential Murder and Obstruction of Justice

The suspicious circumstances surrounding the deceased Special Detective suggest deeper systemic corruption within state law enforcement. This Court’s intervention is necessary to prevent potential cover-ups and to ensure accountability and transparency in the face of serious allegations against state officers.

V. CONCLUSION

For the forgoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests this Court grant the writ of certiorari to review the decision of the [Lower Court Name] and hold that the unlawful detention of Petitioner by state law enforcement officers constitutes a severe violation of constitutional rights, necessitating further investigation into the implications of the Special Detective’s death.

Respectfully submitted,

[Bradley Tyler Burns]
[401 Court House Square]
[Eastern District Of Alexandria, Virginia USA]
[ciabradleyburns@gmail.com]
[Self Represented CIA Prosecutor, Legal Division CIA]
[Power of Attorney Gary Smith]

Date: [3/7/2025]

---

 

The writ of certiorari is a legal term that refers to a type of order issued by the United States Supreme Court. It is a mechanism by which the Court agrees to review the decision of a lower court. The term "certiorari" comes from Latin, meaning "to be informed of," and it indicates the Court's decision to become informed about a lower court's case.

Key Aspects of Writ of Certiorari:

1. Discretionary Power: The Supreme Court has the discretion to grant or deny writs of certiorari. Unlike some other courts, which may be obligated to hear certain types of cases, the Supreme Court usually chooses cases that have substantial federal or constitutional issues.

2. Petition for Certiorari: To initiate the process, a party wishing to have their case reviewed by the Supreme Court must file a petition for a writ of certiorari. This petition outlines the case background, the specific legal questions involved, and the reasons why the Supreme Court should take the case.

3. Criteria for Granting Certiorari: The Court typically grants certiorari for cases that:

   • Involve conflicting decisions among different federal or state courts, leading to a lack of uniformity in the law.
   • Raise significant constitutional issues or questions of federal law.
   • Have important implications for public policy or the interpretation of laws.

4. Rule of Four: A case is granted certiorari if at least four justices agree to hear it. This is known as the "Rule of Four." If fewer than four justices vote in favor, the petition is denied.

5. Outcome of Certiorari: If the Supreme Court grants a writ of certiorari, the case is then placed on the Court’s docket for oral argument and subsequent decision. If the petition is denied, the decision of the lower court stands.

6. Impact on Legal Precedent: Cases that the Supreme Court hears and decides upon can establish important legal precedents, shaping the interpretation of law across the country.

Overall, the writ of certiorari is a vital way for the Supreme Court to manage its docket and focus on cases of significant legal importance, thereby influencing American law and constitutional interpretation.

[CIABrad.eth]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF [UNITED STATES]

PETITIONER: [Bradley Tyler Burns]
RESPONDENT: [Kentucky State Court/Judicial Authority]
CASE NO.: [121-po-588]

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

To the Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of [United States]:

Petitioner, [Bradley Tyler Burns], respectfully petitions this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the [Name of Lower Court or Judicial Authority] on [March 28th 2021], relating to the improper exclusion of evidence and the wrongful extradition of Petitioner to a non-existent court case, which occurred on two occasions. It occurred in Kentucky & Arizona.

I. INTRODUCTION

This petition seeks to address significant legal issues regarding due process violations and procedural irregularities that have resulted in grave injustices against Petitioner. Specifically, the failure to admit critical court documents into the state record and the wrongful extradition related to a court case that did not exist have raised substantial concerns regarding the integrity of the judicial process.

II. STATEMENT OF FACTS

1. On [December 29th 2021], Petitioner was wrongfully extradited to [Fayette County Detention Center] to appear in a purported court case (Case No. [121-po-588]) that, unbeknownst to Petitioner, had been dismissed prior to this extradition.

2. Despite the dismissal of the case, [Eastern District Of Alexandria], failed to communicate with relevant jurisdictions, leading to the erroneous extradition of Petitioner based on false pretenses.

3. Furthermore, Petitioner had previously submitted relevant court documents that clearly demonstrated the case’s dismissal. However, these documents were not admitted into the record by the [Lower Court or Judicial Authority], undermining the foundational rights of Petitioner to a fair hearing.

4. A second extradition occurred on [May 15th 2024], where similar protocols were ignored, once again resulting in Petitioner being brought to court for a non-existent case, causing undue harm and distress. Law enforcement in Arizona used false medical records where deprivation of rights under color of law occurred multiple times.

III. QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. Did the failure of the [Lower Court or Judicial Authority] to admit crucial court documents into the state record violate Petitioner’s right to due process?

2. Was the extradition of Petitioner based on a court case that had effectively ceased to exist an abuse of legal authority and a violation of fundamental rights?

3. Did the law enforcement agencies use already in question medical records and falsified NCIC records?

4. Was there ever a court proceeding during false arrest and imprisonment over 2 years of time?

5. Was there ever a jury?

IV. ARGUMENT

A. Denial of Due Process through Document Exclusion

The denial to admit pertinent court documents constitutes a violation of Petitioner’s due process rights under the [State of Kentucky] Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment. A fair judicial process necessitates the consideration of all relevant evidence, and the exclusion of such documents reflects a failure to uphold these core principles of justice.

B. Wrongful Extradition

The wrongful extradition of Petitioner on two separate occasions, based on a non-existent case, exemplifies an egregious misuse of judicial procedures and law enforcement authority. Such actions not only violate statutory and constitutional protections but also erode public trust in the judicial system. This Court's review is crucial to prevent future injustices and to clarify the legal standards regarding extraditions and case dismissals.

V. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that this Court grant the writ of certiorari to review the decisions of the [Lower Court or Judicial Authority] regarding the exclusion of critical evidence and multiple wrongful extraditions. The Petitioner's rights to due process and a fair judicial proceeding have been compromised, necessitating this Court's intervention.

Respectfully submitted,

[Bradley Tyler Burns]
[401 Courthouse Square]
[Eastern District Alexandria, Virginia, USA]
[7027734529]
[Self Represented CIA Prosecutor]
[Power Of Attorney Gary Smith III]

Date: [03/07/2025]

[CIABrad.eth]

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Threat To National Security Filed To Back Door Of Supreme Court Building

Susan Frimpong - Brett Kavanaugh Legal Clerk

72 Hours Before William "Billy" Evans Died

Central Intelligence Agency Special Protective Services Division

Tampering and Obstruction Of Justice, DOJ 1666 Violations Reported By Federal Law Enforcement

No. 177776

Petitioner: [Bradley Tyler Burns]
Respondent: State of [Kentucky State Police Phillip Burnett Jr.]

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

To the Honorable Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States:

1. Introduction

Petitioner, [Bradley Tyler Burns], respectfully petitions this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the [Eastern District of Kentucky] in the case originating from [121-po-588 Eastern District of Alexandria Virginia For the Central Intelligence Agency]. This petition arises from a compelling need to address egregious misconduct within the state court system that has resulted in the systematic denial of justice and the suppression of critical evidence relating to serious allegations of criminal activity, including murder and child trafficking.

2. Statement of the Case

The events leading to this petition derive from Petitioner's attempts to present substantial evidence concerning the wrongful arrest, abduction, and torture of military police officers who courageously sought to expose a network of individuals involved in committing heinous crimes against children. In the course of pursuing legal remedies in the [Eastern District Of Alexandria Virginia United States, Eastern District of Kentucky United States], Petitioner submitted a comprehensive body of evidence, including affidavits, photographs, and expert testimony, that substantiated claims of misconduct perpetrated by law enforcement and judicial officials.

However, the state court system has demonstrated an alarming pattern of corruption and refusal to admit this critical evidence into the record. The court dismissed motions and exhibits without proper review, averting its gaze from material facts that directly challenge the integrity of the judicial process. This calculated negligence effectively protects individuals implicated in the very crimes being reported, raising serious constitutional concerns regarding due process and equal protection under the law.

3. Questions Presented

• Whether the [Eastern District Of Alexandria Virginia United States, Eastern District of Kentucky United States] acted in violation of capital constitutional protections by refusing to admit evidence crucial to the exposure of organized criminal activity, specifically murder and child trafficking.

• Whether the systemic corruption within the state court system warrants the intervention of this Court to restore faith in the rule of law and ensure justice for victims of crime and those exposing such crimes.

4. Reasons for Granting Certiorari

The present case is of profound national significance and highlights the urgent need for this Court to review and rectify the deficiencies within the state court system that facilitate the corruption and malfeasance of public officials. The refusal of the state court to acknowledge credible evidence of severe criminal conduct undermines the public's trust in the judicial system and poses a grave danger to the integrity of justice in our society.

Additionally, without the intervention of this Court, Petitioner's rights to due process and access to the courts will continue to be compromised, leaving victims of the described crimes without recourse and emboldening those who operate outside the bounds of the law. The protection of fundamental rights and the pursuit of truth necessitate a thorough examination of the state court's actions.

5. Conclusion

Given the serious implications of this case on the integrity of the judicial process and the protection of civil rights, Petitioner respectfully requests that this Court grant the writ of certiorari to review the decision of the [Eastern District Of Alexandria Virginia United States, Eastern District of Kentucky United States]. It is imperative that justice be served and that this Court provides a forum for accountability and truth.

Respectfully submitted,
[Bradley Tyler Burns]
[401 Court House Square]
[Eastern District of Alexandria]
[Central Intelligence Agency - Supreme Court Police Office]
[03/08/2025]